Showing posts with label Christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christ. Show all posts

Saturday, November 8, 2008

The Death of Christ

Who is Jesus Christ for me? He is the only human being in the whole world of history who has dared to claim what God himself claimed in the Old Covenant and who was therefore seen as crazy and possessed (Mk. 3:21ff) and was thus crucified for raising this claim. For it is fitting for a sage to show humility and for a prophet to say “Thus says the Lord,” but not for someone to say: “But I say unto you.”

God the Father has confirmed this claim by raising Jesus from the dead and this has launched the primitive Christian kernel of dogmatics, grounding all its statements: that God is love; that the immanent Trinity has been revealed in the economic Trinity; and indeed that this revelation is God’s “orthopraxis” – the total surrendering of his Son to the point of descent into hell. This is the greatest possible conception of God: he is, with Hegel, identity of identity (God is everything, he is eternal life) and of non-idenity (God is dead insofar as he has identified himself with godlessness; he is so vital (so much love) that he can afford to be dead. No religion or world view has dared to think or proclaim anything like this about God, man and the world. That is why Christianity remains without analogy in the world; it rests not on an “idea” but on a fact: Jesus Christ. And this is a fact that remains as an unfissionable atom, fused into a unity of claim, Cross and Resurrection. On this fact depends whether we can dare to address Being as love and thus whether we can see everything that exists as worthy of love. This is a thought without the countenance of the world would be scarcely endurable to us.

- von Balthasar


Sunday, January 20, 2008

Face of Christ

Most of us who only briefly reflect on it would say that no one knows what Jesus actually looked like, but that does not mean we cannot profitably speculate. To wit: given that Jesus has a divine Father who is pure spirit, then he would not have received any physical DNA from his Father. Instead, it stands to reason that Jesus received his physical characteristics from his mother, from whom he received his human nature.

Consequently, in answer to the question what does Jesus actually look like, we can answer: "Look into the face of Mary. There you will find the Son." Of course, this may beg the question of what Mary looks like, but it also opens us up to deeper reflections and prayerful meditation.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Paradoxes of Faith . . . a Faith of Paradoxes

Duc in altum (Luke 5:4)

The Oxford American Dictionary defines paradox as “a seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or proposition that when investigated or explained may prove to be well founded or true.” Essential to the nature of a paradox is two things that seem to contradict one another but in fact exist in perfect union, harmony, and complementarity. For a paradox to work, there cannot be either one thing or another, nor even two things collapsed into one. Rather, two seemingly opposed things must be held in our minds at one and the same time without being in conflict, without one eliminating the other. A genuine paradox is not “either this or that” but “both this and that.”

Now Catholicism is a faith full of paradoxes. Indeed, it is a faith of paradoxes. At every turn we reconcile seeming opposites and unite what appears to be contradictory. Catholic theology speaks less of “either/or” and more in terms of “both/and” – and precisely when others would seem opposition and conflict. For example, God is both one and three, our Savior is both God and man, Mary is both virgin and mother. In each instance we find a paradox: two seemingly opposed things united harmoniously and therefore beautifully.

This penchant for paradox brings to light the difference between Catholicism and other faiths. Where other religions say “either/or” Catholicism consistently responds “both/and.” Other religions say that God must be either entirely separate from the world (Islam, Deism) or at one with the world (Pantheism, Buddhism, Hinduism); Catholicism holds that God is both distinct from this world and in it. Other religions hold that God is either one (Islam) or many (Pantheism, Hinduism), Catholicism holds that God is both one and three.

The list could go on (and it will in subsequent columns). Point is, we do well to appreciate the beauty and power of such paradoxes. For beauty you must have various things. You cannot have a beautiful painting with just one color or one line, nor a beautiful song with just one note. Beauty requires diversity. At the same time, these diverse things must be in concert with one another. Paintings should not have warring colors and lines, nor should music have competing notes (which explains why so much modern art and music is ugly: it presents conflict, not harmony). Beauty demands different parts brought together harmoniously. So in the Catholic faith we find different truths brought together in that harmonious whole called “the deposit of faith.”

Second, the power of paradoxes. Their seeming absurdity (Both God and man? Both virgin and mother?) ought not discourage or frustrate us. Rather, it should provoke a wonder and interest so that we pursue the truth more, and rejoice more in finding it. Like the parables of our Lord, Catholic paradoxes seem to be in the very nature of faith because they demand a childlike trust in God. They require us to trust that what we see as contradictory and absurd He brings into a wonderful unity and harmony of truth.

Paradox is immediately relevant for this Sunday, for it is the lens through which we understand and appreciate the Feast of Christ the King. Other faiths and/or ideologies say that we must be either powerful or weak. Either we have authority and wield it over others, or we have none and must serve. Indeed, this is the mindset of our culture. But in the person of Christ the King we encounter a beautiful and timely paradox: authority and service are united. In him we learn, as the ancient saying has it, To reign is to serve. It is not that we must either run roughshod over others with power or remain simpering, whimpering slaves. Rather, in Him we find authority and service united. True authority is intended for sacrifice, and in sacrifice is revealed the one who truly reigns. Only in the beauty of this paradox do we find peace.

- Rev. Paul Scalia

Sunday, May 6, 2007

Poverty and Love

There is a mysterious relationship between extreme poverty and love.
In order to truly love, one must be very poor, and Jesus is the poor one par excellence.

Saturday, April 28, 2007

His Passion, My Cruelty

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Pagan Prophet of Christ: Plato

That there are positions and affirmations in Platonism that can be understood as foreshadowings of Christianity is undeniable. An example of a passage that overturns the moral sentiments of the Greeks and anticipates, almost, the Gospel precept, if anyone strike you on the cheek, turn the other cheek, can be found in the Gorgias, 527B-D.

But, putting aside various other less eloquent examples, consider this utterly baffling passage from the Republic, II, 361E:
What they will say is this: that such being his disposition the just will have to endure the lash, the rack, chains, the branding-iron in his eyes, and finally after every extremity of suffering, he will be crucified . . .