Showing posts with label tragedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tragedy. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Sisyphus

Sisyphus: the futile laborer, a man focused on the immediate, whose whole being is exerted toward accomplishing nothing.

Sound familiar?


Monday, April 28, 2008

Unexpected Meditation XIII

We are a tragic race. And this is true as much of our comforts, passions and affections as it is of our unexpected, unjust, unwanted deaths. But we are also a funny race. It is often more difficult to know which is more problematic to come to terms with - the fact that we die or the fact that we laugh. I am inclined to suspect the latter.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Unexpected Meditation X

Physics and religion both sound like gibberish if you do not know the basic axioms, or take the time to know the basic axioms. The tragedy in believing or seeing religion as mere gibberish - that is, the tragedy of not taking the time to know its basic axioms - is that the act of doing so ultimately separates one from the personal love of others: if one knows the basic axioms, one would know why.

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Tragedy of the Moderns

On tragedy, from William F. Lynch's classic Christ and Apollo: "It is my deep conviction that the literary imagination, as it has been used in the theory and making of modern tragedy, has been "dishonest." It knows quite well, as we all do, that tragedy, when it is really achieved, produces an extraordinary impact of beauty and exaltation in the spectator. My own conclusion is that this achievement of tragedy has always occurred when the dramatic text has allowed itself to move through human time to the very last point of human finitude and helplessness. Here we have once again a form of the remarkable human law . . . that a kind of infinite is reached by marching through a finite. It might be put this way, somewhat paradoxically but truly, according to the feeling and actuality of great tragic texts: in tragedy a spectator is brought to the experience of a deep beauty and exaltation, but not by the way of beauty and exaltation. This is indeed . . . a natural mystery, understandable to the deep, experiential intelligence but not to the purely rational intelligence.

But the terms of this situation (and the textual facts) have been completely switched around by very many of the theorists and playwrights of our day. Apparently quite incapable of believing that anything good (much less beauty and exaltation) can come out of so enslaving a thing as the limited finite, the narrow gates of human helplessness, they have insisted, both as critics and writers, that exaltation must come out of exaltation, that infinites must come out of infinites. They therefore do a very dishonest thing . . . because they proclaim, against all the evidence, that the achievement of great tragedy has always been rooted in mystical conquests of the human spirit over pain, in the emergence of godlike strength and qualities in man in the very midst of tragic defeat. The tragic figure is really an exalted conqueror."


"A God on a Cross, that is all my theology."